blogger profileblogger profile
Alison Piepmeier
My life is all about bringing down the patriarchy. I write books and articles about feminism, and I also teach and direct the Women's and Gender Studies Program at the College of Charleston....
blog entryblog entry

No Country for Old Men

Thursday, December, 20, 2007
My husband is a huge fan of the Coen brothers’ movies.  Raising Arizona is one of his all-time favorites (“If you think round is funny” is a familiar saying in our house).  I don’t know that I’d say across the board that I’m a fan of their films—as I’ve mentioned earlier, my movie tastes tend to be somewhat lowbrow—but I do love Fargo, a film that gave me a permanent crush on Frances McDormand (who, incidentally, later played the only Women’s Studies professor I’ve ever seen in a mainstream movie, in Something’s Gotta Give).

So when No Country for Old Men came out, we had to go see it.  Here’s the deal:  the movie I discussed yesterday, The Golden Compass, wasn’t good, but I enjoyed it.  No Country for Old Men was good, but I didn’t enjoy it.  What this says about my system of evaluating cultural productions, I don’t know.

no_country_for_old_men_4.jpgNo Country for Old Men had a series of bleak desert landscapes that were oddly similar to the bleak snow-covered landscapes of Fargo, and both films offered a sheriff protagonist making his or her way through these landscapes in search of justice or some resolution--Frances McDormand’s Marge Gunderson, and Tommy Lee Jones’s Ed Tom Bell.  Both characters are competent, thoughtful, and kind.  Unlike Marge Gunderson, though, Ed Tom Bell doesn’t stand as the moral center of the movie.  By the end, things have fallen apart so completely that there’s no moral center whatsoever.  And when you think the film might be offering the message that things have gotten much worse than they used to be, you’re informed by Bell that, in fact, things have always been this bad—this brutally violent, this heartless, with people killing other people out of greed or just meanness.

I don’t have a great love for films whose message is, there is no message, because humanity just sucks.

If you’re looking to be frightened, the villain--Anton Chigurh, played by Javier Bardem-- is one of the scariest I’ve seen.  And I did love the local color characters in the film.  The Coen brothers always do a great job with the local color, and these people were spot-on rural townsfolk—just the tiniest bit exaggerated for effect, but I really got the impression watching them that the Coens might have scanned the gas stations and diners in West Texas to recruit these cast members.  They made the film for me.  And several of them didn’t get killed.

KellyLove
KellyLove
Posted Wed, 01/02/2008 - 14:47
One of the things I think is so interesting about the Coens is that their movies are SO completely different from one another. I've heard people refer to particular films as "Coenesque," but I honestly don't know what they mean by it (though I could go on and on about American themes in their work, about dialogue, etc.). Fargo and Lebowski and Raising Arizona could be the subject of a film studies dissertation, but Raising Arizona is a very different film than Ladykillers, Intolerable Cruelty, etc. I've watched most of the Coen's films because I adore Raising Arizona (it's one of my Top 10 Faves of All Time) but honestly didn't care for Ladykillers, Intolerable Cruelty, or The Man Who Wasn't There. They don't compare to the humor in Fargo, Lebowski, or Raising Arizona.